Programas de aprendizaje socioemocional para estudiantes: una revisión sistemática
Programas de aprendizaje socioemocional para estudiantes: una revisión sistemática
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.356162619055
-
Palavras-chave: competencias socioemocionales; aprendizaje socioemocional; estudiantes; programas de intervención; revisión sistemática.
-
Keywords: socioemotional competences; social and emotional learning; students; intervention programs; systematic review.
-
Abstract: The development of socioemotional competences is a fundamental component for promoting students’ well-being, school climate, and holistic development. This study aimed to analyze and systematize the available scientific evidence on Social and Emotional Learning programs implemented with students, considering their contextual and methodological characteristics, types of intervention, implementation formats, main intervention focus, educational levels, implementers, limitations, and future research lines. A systematic literature review was conducted guided by PRISMA guidelines and methodological criteria for literature reviews in education. The final sample consisted of 10 empirical studies, organized through an identification table and a data extraction process. The results show a concentration of studies in North America and Europe, each representing 30% of the sample. Quantitative approaches predominated (90%), as well as experimental and quasi-experimental designs, each accounting for 40%. The interventions were mainly implemented in preschool education (50%) and were mostly delivered by teachers (50%). Regarding intervention types, SEL programs, mindfulness-based interventions, teacher training or coaching interventions, and relationship-focused interventions were identified. The most frequent limitations were related to sample size, research design, follow-up duration, and implementation factors. The review concludes that SEL programs aimed at students represent a relevant line of educational intervention; however, the available evidence still presents limitations related to sample size, methodological heterogeneity, longitudinal follow-up, and implementation processes
- Pilar Jara-Coatt
- Fabiola Sáez-Delgado
- Fabricio Contreras-Márquez
- Joaquin Brieba-Fuenzalida
- Richard Rodríguez-Gómez