CIMENTO COM ANTIBIÓTICO VERSUS ANTIBIÓTICO SISTÊMICO ISOLADO EM ARTROPLASTIA TOTAL: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA E METANÁLISE DE ESTUDOS CLÍNICOS
CIMENTO COM ANTIBIÓTICO VERSUS ANTIBIÓTICO SISTÊMICO ISOLADO EM ARTROPLASTIA TOTAL: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA E METANÁLISE DE ESTUDOS CLÍNICOS
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.39325280814
-
Palavras-chave: artroplastia total; cimento com antibiótico; antibiótico sistêmico; revisão sistemática; metanálise.
-
Keywords: total arthroplasty; antibiotic-loaded cement; systemic antibiotic; systematic review; meta-analysis.
-
Abstract: Periprosthetic joint infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty are devastating complications with major clinical, functional, and economic impact. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) has been proposed as an additional prophylactic strategy to systemic antibiotic therapy. This chapter presents a systematic review with meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA methodology, comparing ALBC versus systemic antibiotic alone (SYS) in patients undergoing total arthroplasty. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective controlled studies were included. Primary outcomes were deep periprosthetic infection, reoperation for infection, and systemic antibiotic-related adverse events. Ten studies (n=9,190) were included. ALBC significantly reduced deep infections (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81) and reoperations for infection (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46–0.82), without a significant increase in systemic adverse events (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.48–1.45). ALBC represents an effective and safe prophylactic strategy.
- Academic Advantage
- Rafael Everton Assunção Ribeiro da Costa
- Jennyfer Souza Andrade
- Núbia de Amorim da Costa Hoth
- Valkmira Izabel de Oliveira Silva
- Everton William Benevides Silva