A aplicação de Inteligência Artificial e Robótica Assistiva no Cuidado à Pessoa Idosa
A aplicação de Inteligência Artificial e Robótica Assistiva no Cuidado à Pessoa Idosa
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.9161125180313
-
Palavras-chave: Inteligência Artificial; Robótica Assistiva; Pessoas Idosas; Autonomia; Qualidade de Vida.
-
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Assistive Robotics; Older Adults; Autonomy; Quality of Life.
-
Abstract: Introduction: Population ageing presents new challenges for healthcare systems, requiring innovative solutions that promote autonomy, safety, and quality of life among older adults. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Assistive Robotics (AR) have emerged as tools with strong potential to transform geriatric care, complementing human work and enabling more personalized interventions. Objective: To identify and analyse the available scientific evidence on the application of AI and AR in elderly care, exploring their contributions to autonomy, safety, and quality of life, as well as their implications for healthcare practice. Method: An integrative literature review was conducted using the PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases, covering the period from 2015 to 2025, according to the PIO strategy. Empirical studies and reviews involving older adults and the use of AI and/or AR applied to care were included. After screening and eligibility assessment, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Three main thematic categories emerged: (1) Promotion of autonomy and functionality, showing evidence of improved physical and cognitive independence; (2) Social interaction and emotional well-being, highlighting the role of social robots in reducing loneliness and stimulating cognition; and (3) Safety and intelligent monitoring, with contributions from AI in early risk detection and clinical decision support. Conclusion: The application of AI and AR demonstrates consistent benefits in improving the quality of life and autonomy of older adults, although ethical, technological, and acceptance challenges remain. Stronger methodological research is needed to consolidate the evidence and guide safe, equitable, and person-centred practices.
- Bruno Santos