Artigo - Atena Editora

Artigo

Baixe agora

Livros

USE OF THE HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS METHOD (AHP) IN THE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR THE NATIONAL AUTOMATIC VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM – SINIAV

This work aims to analyze alternatives for the technological model, institutional model and regulatory instruments for the implementation of the National Automatic Vehicle Identification System – SINIAV, through the use of radio frequency identification technology (RFID). For this purpose, the Analytic Hierarchy Process was used.AHP)), for which the available alternatives and the respective evaluation criteria were identified. The results showed that, for the technological model, the IAV (Automatic Vehicle Identification) protocol must be revised to contemplate the technological evolution, in a non-restrictive way, allowing any type of tag that meets the SINIAV requirements to be homologated. For the regulatory model, it is recommended that the SINIAV be provided for by law and regulated by CONTRAN resolution, in order to provide greater legal certainty, meet technical aspects and guarantee the necessary flexibility to contemplate the technological evolution of systems and equipment. As for the institutional model, although the cost aspect has been relevant for the State Departments of Transit (DETRAN).

Ler mais

USE OF THE HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS METHOD (AHP) IN THE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES FOR THE NATIONAL AUTOMATIC VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM – SINIAV

  • DOI: 10.22533/at.ed.3172282202122

  • Palavras-chave: RFID, SINIAV, ITS, AHP, Hierarchical Analysis.

  • Keywords: RFID, SINIAV, ITS, AHP, Hierarchical Analysis.

  • Abstract:

    This work aims to analyze alternatives for the technological model, institutional model and regulatory instruments for the implementation of the National Automatic Vehicle Identification System – SINIAV, through the use of radio frequency identification technology (RFID). For this purpose, the Analytic Hierarchy Process was used.AHP)), for which the available alternatives and the respective evaluation criteria were identified. The results showed that, for the technological model, the IAV (Automatic Vehicle Identification) protocol must be revised to contemplate the technological evolution, in a non-restrictive way, allowing any type of tag that meets the SINIAV requirements to be homologated. For the regulatory model, it is recommended that the SINIAV be provided for by law and regulated by CONTRAN resolution, in order to provide greater legal certainty, meet technical aspects and guarantee the necessary flexibility to contemplate the technological evolution of systems and equipment. As for the institutional model, although the cost aspect has been relevant for the State Departments of Transit (DETRAN).

  • Rone Evaldo Barbosa
  • Pastor Willy Gonzales Taco
  • Alexandre Garcês de Araújo
Fale conosco Whatsapp