Storia, aspetti pratici e (in)conformità costituzionale del patteggiamento in confronto all'accordo sull'applicazione immediata di pena previsto dall'articolo 341 del Progetto di Legge n° 8.045/2010 (Nuovo Codice di Procedura Penale Brasiliano) Cosa si può imparare dall'esperienza italiana?

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.515721026140515

• Palavras-chave: ..

• Keywords: Comparative law; Penal process; Negotiated criminal justice; Plea bargaining.

• Abstract: Summary: The research analyses and compares part of the Italian experience in the implementation and development of the application of the sentence upon request of the parties (patteggiamento), contained in Title II, article 444, of the CPPIt., with the “agreement on the immediate execution of the sentence”, regulated in article 341 of Draft Law n. 8.045/2010, still under consideration by the Brazilian Parliament, promoting a micro-comparison between these institutions. The survey incisively addresses the following issues: (i) nature of the sentence; (ii) level of judicial control of the agreement; (iii) identification of the evidentiary standard and the sentencing rule used; (iv) irrevocability of the sentence; (v) exclusion of victims in the formalization of the agreement; (vi) absence of subjective right to the agreement; (vii) maximum sentence of eight years; and (viii) non-existence of a limit for the judicial reduction of the agreed sentence. Finally, possible amendments to the Brazilian law were suggested.