REVISÃO DE ESTRATÉGIAS DE TREINAMENTO PARA MITIGAÇÃO DE VIESES COGNITIVOS EM SUPORTE AVANÇADO DE VIDA PEDIÁTRICO E ADULTO
REVISÃO DE ESTRATÉGIAS DE TREINAMENTO PARA MITIGAÇÃO DE VIESES COGNITIVOS EM SUPORTE AVANÇADO DE VIDA PEDIÁTRICO E ADULTO
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.8089262627033
-
Palavras-chave: Vieses cognitivos; Suporte Avançado de Vida em Cardiologia; Reanimação cardiopulmonar; Simulação; Auxílios cognitivos; Segurança do paciente
-
Keywords: ....
-
Abstract: Introduction: Decision-making in cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) is particularly susceptible to cognitive biases due to high time pressure, stress, and clinical complexity. Biases such as anchoring, fixation, and premature closure contribute significantly to diagnostic errors and adverse outcomes. Objective: This systematic review sought to identify and synthesize evidence on training strategies and cognitive support tools designed to mitigate specific cognitive biases in ACLS and PALS scenarios. Methods: A systematic review was conducted with searches in the SciSpace, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. Original studies and reviews describing educational or technological interventions focused on mitigating cognitive biases in ACLS/PALS simulations or clinical scenarios were included. Results: Of the 159 articles initially identified, 20 met the inclusion criteria. The strategies were categorized into three main areas: (1) realistic and high-fidelity simulation (n=12 studies), (2) cognitive aids and checklists (n=15), and (3) tele-simulation and remote learning (n=3). Simulation proved effective in reducing fixation and premature closure by requiring continuous reassessment and teamwork. Cognitive aids, particularly digital applications and structured checklists, demonstrated a reduction in cognitive load and improved adherence to algorithms, although with limitations in design and attention distribution. Discussion: The identified mitigation mechanisms include reduction of cognitive load, directed guidance of attention, promotion of team reflexivity, and stimulation of critical thinking based on pathophysiology. The integration between simulation and support tools emerges as a synergistic approach, yet challenges persist regarding the inadequate design of aids and the need for validation in real clinical scenarios. Conclusion: The effective mitigation of cognitive biases in ACLS and PALS requires a multifaceted approach that combines high-fidelity simulation with well-designed decision support tools, integrated into a teaching culture that promotes metacognition and reflective thinking.
- Francisca das Chagas Monteiro
- Helen Susy de Sousa Bastos
- Marcella Victória de Jesus
- Najla Farias Khattar
- Aline Katiuscia Leal Moraes Vasconcelos
- Marcelino Afonso Lobato
- Jhulianne Damasceno Duarte
- Maria Fabrícia Santos Barros
- Jessica Crislane Guimarães da Costa
- Pablo Rodrigo do Nascimento Rodrigues
- Kyala Margalho Pimentel da Silva
- Rosana Monteiro dos Santos Brito