Giftedness as Evolutionary Neurodivergence: From Compensated Structural Savantism to DWRI Intelligence - Atena EditoraAtena Editora

Artigo

Baixe agora

Livros

Giftedness as Evolutionary Neurodivergence: From Compensated Structural Savantism to DWRI Intelligence

What happens when a brain is built for extraordinary processing but the surrounding clinical world has no category for it? That gap is the practical problem this article addresses. Profound giftedness, IQ at or above 145, fewer than one person per thousand, sits outside the conceptual architecture of both neurotypicality and disorder. Four constructs are proposed and integrated here. Evolutionary neurodivergence frames the profoundly gifted profile as neurological variation conferring net adaptive advantage, not deficit. Compensated Structural Savantism (CSS) argues that the profoundly gifted phenotype shares autistic-spectrum genomic hardware with classic savantism but differs by the addition of elite executive function, producing a compensated rather than decompensated expression of the same substrate. Functional depression names a psiconeurobiological state in which high cognitive output persists alongside progressive affective disengagement, a form of suffering that standard instruments are not built to detect. DWRI Intelligence (Development of Wide Regions of Intellectual Interference) designates a processing style too broad and too associative for conventional psychometric resolution. Empirical grounding comes from the DWRI-GIP v2.1 protocol at CPAH: 200 participants assessed with Wechsler scales and genomic data from TellmeGen, 23andMe, and MyHeritage with NYGC imputation, plus a structured survey of 512 confirmed gifted individuals from 20 countries. Each claim is labelled throughout: what rests on data, what remains at the hypothesis stage, and what still needs outside verification. Methodological constraints are set out explicitly.

Ler mais

Giftedness as Evolutionary Neurodivergence: From Compensated Structural Savantism to DWRI Intelligence

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.0159672604063

  • Palavras-chave: profound giftedness; evolutionary neurodivergence; DWRI intelligence; compensated structural savantism; functional depression; prefrontal cortex; polygenic risk scores

  • Keywords: profound giftedness; evolutionary neurodivergence; DWRI intelligence; compensated structural savantism; functional depression; prefrontal cortex; polygenic risk scores

  • Abstract: What happens when a brain is built for extraordinary processing but the surrounding clinical world has no category for it? That gap is the practical problem this article addresses. Profound giftedness, IQ at or above 145, fewer than one person per thousand, sits outside the conceptual architecture of both neurotypicality and disorder. Four constructs are proposed and integrated here. Evolutionary neurodivergence frames the profoundly gifted profile as neurological variation conferring net adaptive advantage, not deficit. Compensated Structural Savantism (CSS) argues that the profoundly gifted phenotype shares autistic-spectrum genomic hardware with classic savantism but differs by the addition of elite executive function, producing a compensated rather than decompensated expression of the same substrate. Functional depression names a psiconeurobiological state in which high cognitive output persists alongside progressive affective disengagement, a form of suffering that standard instruments are not built to detect. DWRI Intelligence (Development of Wide Regions of Intellectual Interference) designates a processing style too broad and too associative for conventional psychometric resolution. Empirical grounding comes from the DWRI-GIP v2.1 protocol at CPAH: 200 participants assessed with Wechsler scales and genomic data from TellmeGen, 23andMe, and MyHeritage with NYGC imputation, plus a structured survey of 512 confirmed gifted individuals from 20 countries. Each claim is labelled throughout: what rests on data, what remains at the hypothesis stage, and what still needs outside verification. Methodological constraints are set out explicitly.

  • Fabiano de Abreu Agrela Rodrigues
  • Luiz Felipe Chaves Carvalho
  • Flávio Henrique dos Santos Nascimento
Fale conosco Whatsapp