Comparison between immediate implant techniques and delayed implants using different Alveolar Preservation techniques on functional and aesthetic aspects: Literature review

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.15943924180410

• Palavras-chave: Aumento do rebordo alveolar; Enxerto ósseo; Implante Dentário; Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário; Extração Dentária.

• Keywords: Enlargement of the alveolar ridge; Bone graft; Dental Implant, Immediate Load on Dental Implant, Tooth Extraction.

• Abstract:

  With the loss of tooth structure, biological and physiological events can lead to loss of alveolar structure and surrounding soft tissues, especially in the first three months. The use of implants to replace lost dental elements is highly reliable. Among the protocols for installing implants, according to Morton D. et al. 2018, they are: type 1 (Installation immediately after extraction), type 2 (early installation within 1 to 2 months after extraction), type 3 (late implantation, after 3 to 4 months after extraction) and type 4 (conventional installation, after 4 months. The use of filling biomaterials and guided bone regeneration techniques, as well as the choice of the appropriate moment for implant installation, have been the subject of study in the search for reducing dimensional changes that occur after tooth extraction, in addition to functional aspects. such as predictability, marginal bone loss, keratinized gums and aesthetic aspects. This study reviewed the literature in search of more recent studies on Immediate Implant Installation and Alveolar Preservation, to establish a possible direction on which technique demonstrates more favorable and predictable results when compared.