DAILY APPLICATION OF PHOTOPROTECTION: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN PATIENTS OF DERMATOLOGICAL CARE PROCESS IN A TEACHING CLINIC IN THE CITY OF SÃO PAULO

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.1594712401085

• Palavras-chave: Photoprotection; Sunscreen; Prevalence; Brazilian population; Cross-sectional study.

• Keywords: Photoprotection; Sunscreen; Prevalence; Brazilian population; Cross-sectional study.

• Abstract:

  Introduction: There are numerous photoprotection measures with proven efficacy in the literature, aiming to reduce the individual's sun exposure and prevent possible damage. However, there is an increase in the number of cases of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer, revealing that there is still low adherence to their daily application. Although there are studies carried out in national territory, they do not reflect the population reality of the country as a whole. São Paulo, being a state so diverse culturally, socially and phenotypically, manages to include people from different regions of Brazil.
  Objective: To study the population of São Paulo, whose age range varies from 11 to 84 years, males and females, who use sunscreen, and whether there was a low prevalence of its use.
  Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted with 59 participants at the PROMOVE teaching clinic in São Paulo. A QUIZZ was formulated based on similar studies, searched in the Pubmed and Web of Science databases. Data were analyzed and stratified by demographic characteristics (gender, family income, phototype). The exclusion criteria were incorrect completion of the QUIZZ and those who did not agree to sign the informed consent form.
  Results/Discussion: A total of 80 patients attended the campaign, and 21 individuals were excluded due to partial completion of the data. Regarding the daily use of photoprotection by the population, a prevalence of 44.06% was observed. Of these, 81.58% were women. The stratified analysis revealed a significant association between the use of sunscreen and variables such as gender, family income and phototype.
  Conclusion: There is a significant prevalence of non-use of topical photoprotection measures in the population studied. Gaps in adherence to these practices, in the diverse Brazilian population, indicate areas where awareness campaigns can be improved to reduce this prevalence.